Case study
Recovering ROAS Without Sacrificing Growth
As spend scaled, ROAS slipped. Instead of cutting budgets, we optimized for efficiency, recovering ROAS from 2.78 to 4.07 while operating at a far larger scale.
Background
As advertising investment increased, ROAS declined during the scaling phase. This is a common pattern when brands expand aggressively, but many advertisers respond by cutting budgets too early.
We chose a different approach.
What We Did
Instead of reducing spend, we improved account efficiency by:
- Harvesting high-converting search terms
- Adding negative keywords
- Optimizing bids by performance
- Improving placement strategy
- Redistributing budgets to stronger campaigns
ROAS Trend
Low point during scaling: Apr
| Month | ROAS |
|---|---|
| Jan | 4.34 |
| Feb | 3.85 |
| Mar | 2.98 |
| Apr | 2.78 |
| May | 4.07 |
| Jun | 3.71 |
Key Outcome
ROAS recovered from 2.78 to 4.07 after the optimization phase, while the account continued operating at a significantly larger scale than at the beginning of the engagement.
Scaling creates inefficiencies. Continuous optimization removes them.
Results are from a specific account over the stated period. They are not a guarantee of future outcomes.
Still wondering what's limiting your Amazon growth?
See how SellerRoot analyzes Amazon Ads accounts, uncovers missed opportunities, and helps brands make better optimization decisions.